“TRACE Score: Gives our new Proposal Coordinators the confidence they need without having the knowledge to know if the responses are accurate when performing a first pass. Quality Check: Gives our Proposal managers a quick snapshot of any issues we might not have found otherwise. AI Agent: By far the most beneficial in reducing overall resource time and elevating our responses overall.”

“Being able to use the AI answering agent in our library has reduced our bid response time by 30% overall. It is a feature we now rely heavily on.”

“Answering Agent has had the most use so far, but it's gotten strong reviews from our SME's in the company. It's fast, accountable, and speeds up the work for those not always in the tool considerably.”

“Responsive AI Agents have allowed us to produce much faster drafts. We got slammed with a high number of RFPs at once and wouldn’t have survived without the agent. ”

“Our technical team has discovered that the ASK feature has the capability to answer questions in the language of the question, e.g. if the question is asked in German, the AI response is also in German. Our global teams are very excited for this capability and using it more and more.”

“For TRACE specifically, we envision this score to be a confidence indicator for field teams. High scores (>80) will give teams conviction to leverage an answer without overreliance on SMEs (GTM, Marketing, Legal, Privacy, etc.). Whereas a lower TRACE (below 80) will indicate a need for additional content discovery and/or SME input and review. And if/when you launch Agent Studio for project management, I could see leveraging that to auto-add a Flag or Reviewer if TRACE is below a certain threshold.”

“Because the IT team possesses deep AI expertise, they quickly recognized the operational reality: their core focus was driving core product innovation, not the continuous, heavy backend maintenance required to keep a standalone RFP data model alive.”